top of page


The ultra-conservative 5th circuit court ruled recently that just because a guy has beaten his wife or girlfriend, or any other family member for that matter, that shouldn't prevent him from owning a gun - even if that person is under a restraining order. These deranged judges claimed that because the framers of the constitution didn't prevent wife beaters from owning guns, than we shouldn't either. Keep in mind that it wasn't until 1871 that courts ruled that a husband has no right to beat his wife.

This dangerous decision will undoubtedly lead to the slaughter of even more wives and girlfriends since domestic abusers are more prone to commit violent acts of gun violence than your average man.

I wonder that if the daughter of one of these judges were shot to death by her estranged husband, if the opinion might have been different.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Tomorrow will be 20 years since George W. Bush invaded the sovereign country of Iraq under false pretenses. He thought Saddam Hussein had "weapons of mass destruction" and even got permission to look

The Republican Party used to abhor slavery and rallied against it for years resulting in the Civil War while the Democrats who dominated the South, owned human beings and often treated them like farm

"The Family", also known as "The Fellowship" is a highly secretive organization of elite, powerful, and largely conservative so-called Christians who have operated mostly under the radar since the gro

bottom of page